BORDER PATROL AGENTS REVEAL THE UN IS IN CONTROL OF THE BORDER

Former World Bank Senior Council Says A “Second Species” On Earth Controls Money & Religion

Former World Bank Senior Council, Karen Hudes has been making a lot of noise lately, and she recently said something she’s never said before. She said that a second species on Earth controls money and religion. Many people who have held positions to know things that the rest of us might not know have made some very shocking statements lately. For example, Paul Hellyer, former Canadian Minister of National Defence recently said that there are at least “4 known alien species that have been visiting Earth for thousands of years.” You can read more about that here.

I am aware that just because somebody says something does not mean that it’s true, no matter what their background. At the same time, what she says corroborates with a lot of ancient historical facts, and modern day disclosures of other strange phenomenon, like UFOs, secret societies and more. For someone like this to gain credibility as a World Bank whistle-blower and then all of a sudden make a comment like this is quite shocking. Although, in her interview she did discredit the idea of extraterrestrials on the planet, which I definitely disagree with. There is an enormous amount of evidence out there to suggest we are not alone, and we have indeed been visited. For more information on that click here.

“These countries are not monolithic, there are forces fighting the corruption and there are forces that have totally been co-opted, and the way they act is treasonous to the people in those countries. The group that’s behind the network of control are the Jesuits, and there are also some groups behind them. One of these groups are hominids, they’re not human beings. They are very smart, they are not creative, they are mathematical. They had a much stronger force in the earlier ice-age. They have elongated skulls, they may produce offspring in mating with female humans, but that offspring is not fertile. We live in a world of secret societies, and secrets, and the information that ought to be public is not public.”

 

The quote above if from the show below. She starts speaking about it approximately 21 minutes into the program.

Karen held her senior position at the World Bank for twelve years before deciding to blow the whistle on the World Bank and corruption within it. She studies law at Yale Law School and economics at the University of Amsterdam. She worked in the US Export Import Bank of the US from 1980-1985 and in the Legal Department of the World Bank from 1986-2007. She established the Non-Governmental Organization Committee of the International Law Section of the American Bar Association and the Committee on Multilateralism and the Accountability of International Organizations of the American Branch of the International Law Association.

These are shocking statements that come shortly after gaining attention for being a credible world bank whistleblower, stating that the world is in a “currency war,” that the Federal Reserve continues to print money like crazy, and if they keep going at the pace they are on, other countries will no longer accept this currency. She has been exposing criminal corruption that takes place at the highest levels of financial institutions. In 1999, she reported the corrupt take-over of the second largest bank in the Philippines. She’s exposed the collusion that takes place between financial institutions and various governments, and much much more.

This is a great clip of her telling us some important stuff. Before you brush off what she has to say, keep in mind that the reality of many strange phenomenon has a large amount of proof to back it up, or at least be open to the possibility.

End of The World Secret The Government Doesn’t Want You To Know!!!!

 

The Secret Government PBS 1987 Bill Moyers

Aired on PBS in 1987 and as good as anything on the tape (must see). Moyers is a very respected TV journalist who also worked for Lyndon B. Johnson and has a very professional approach. He interviews many different people involved with the CIA and other government agencies. His documentary gives quite an overview of what has actually happened in the last 50 years regarding the CIA and the cold war (including Iran, Guatamala, Cuba, Viet Nam and Chile) Moyers is so very credible

 

Two Reporters Fired by Fox News for Revealing Health Dangers in Milk

–

EXHIBITS AB OOPSKOP CENTRAL BUFFER STOCK NATIONALITY NEW WORLD ORDER

EXHIBITS AB
OOPSKOP CENTRAL BUFFER STOCK NATIONALITY
NEW WORLD ORDER
IDEAL QUOTES “GLOBAL CASH FUNDS” ON EARTH

UNIVERSAL THE ROOT CONTRACTS EXHIBITS AB-CVAC
PUBLICATION CODE HALIFAX

AUTHORIZED BA1 (OFFICIAL 1, EXHIBIT A) (9/97-13)
ACCEPTABLE COLLATERAL FOR THE TREASURY TAX AND LOAN (TT & L) PROGRAM (31 CFR PART 203)

GRANT:
UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND-UBS A.G
HMT.MR.A1.SINO.AS.S”2″.IR.S.ST

SENDER:
USD-LIQUITE UNLIMITED MANDATE
SPECIAL FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD 552552542AM
FEDERAL RESERVE 33 LIBERTY STREET 10045-0001, USA
HMT.MR.A1.SINO.AS.S”2″.IR.S.ST

TO:
THE WORLD BANK RATU MAS KENCANA ROOM A1-1A
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE, FINDS & APPLY PRESENTATION
SUCESSED
AT COMMERZBANK-GERMANY

BENEFICIARY:
AUTHORITY MANDATE
UN-SWISSINDO COMMITTEE COMPENSATIONS
BULLION BIG BANK RATU MAS KENCANA ROOM A1-1A
(COMMERZBANK-INDONESIA)
PT. BANK NEGARA INDONESIA TBK.
SINGLE CONSULTANT CONTRACTORS
IR. SUGIHARTONO,ST.
INDONESIA

AUTHORIZED FIN-103
ALLOCATION A/100
CERTIFICATED SHARES US$. 1,000,000,000,000,000,000.-
COMMERZBANK-GERMANY, CLEAR & CLEAN MEY 06, 2013.

REF:
DEWAN IKATAN DOKUMEN INTERNASIONAL
THE COMMITTEE OF 300
THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIC AGENCY
UNITED NATION ORGANIZATION

NEO THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GOD SKY EARTH
THE WORLD KEY MASTER GOVERNMENT CENTER

HIS EXCELLENCY
I.H.O-INTERNATIONAL HANDLE ORGANIZATION 459
DEWAN IKATAN DOKUMEN INTERNASIONAL

WE WILL COME TO YOU WITH FULL POWER WITH LOVE, PEACE & KEEPER IN ALL LOCATIONS.

THE ROYAL BLOOD LINE HISTORY REGISTERED WORLD PROGRAM BY THE NEO THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GOD SKY EARTH WITH THE NEW GENERATING GOOD CONTENT TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER “NWO” THE BIG FIVE ORGAN OF THE KINGDOM OF THE BIG FIVE CONTINENT (AAE.A2: KINGDOM OF ASIA, KINGDOM OF AFRICA, KINGDOM OF EUROPE, KINGDOM OF AMERICA, KINGDOM OF EUROPE) AS BORROWER GLOBAL CASH FUNDS AND OR IDEAL QUOTES NEW WORLD ORDER 2013 TO GUARANTEE PROTECTION THE PEOPLES OF 253 NATIONS. CVAC.

PUSAT KOMMANDO DUNIA
P1.PKC-NKRI CIREBON INDONESIA-1
BIG TOP ROYAL, K.681 KING OF KING’S M-1
THE GREATES PRESIDENT-UNO

S/ST/IP.NO.301/UN/2013

HMT.MR.A1.SINO.AS.S”2″.IR.S.ST
CONSORTIUM INTERNATIONAL TRUST OFFICER

SECRETARY GENERAL-UNO

S/ST/IP.NO.301/UN/2013

BAN KI MOON

Countries, Territories and Organisations Adhering to the Busan Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation

The Busan Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation

The Busan Partnership agreement sets out principles, commitments and actions that offer a foundation for effective co-operation in support of international development.

The Busan Partnership agreement is a consensus that a wide range of governments and organisations have expressed their support for. It offers a framework for continued dialogue and efforts to enhance the effectiveness of development co-operation.The Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation was established as a direct result of the Busan Partnership agreement. The Global Partnership will help ensure accountability for implementation of Busan commitments at the political level.After a year-long process of inclusive consultations, the document was finalised during the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness. The Busan Partnership agreement received the supported of government, civil society, private sector and other actors attending the Forum. http://tinyurl.com/l7fuyks

Shared principles to achieve common goals
The Busan Partnership document specifically highlights a set of common principles for all development actors that are key to making development co-operation effective.

• Ownership of development priorities by developing counties: Countries should define the development  model that they want to implement.

• A focus on results: Having a sustainable impact should be the driving force behind investments and efforts in development policy making

• Partnerships for development: Development depends on the participation of all actors, and recognises the diversity and complementarity of their functions.

• Transparency and shared responsibility: Development co-operation must be transparent and accountable to all citizens

http://tinyurl.com/mpkjt8v

How can my government or organisation signal its support for the Busan Partnership document?

Countries and organisations present at HLF-4 have been listed as supporters of the Busan Partnership document, unless they indicated otherwise.

If you represent a government body, organisation, enterprise or international organisation and would like to join the Global Partnership please email info@effectivecooperation.org.

 

Countries and territories endorsing the Busan Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation

See the list of countries, territories and organisations endorsing the Paris Declaration and Accra Agenda for Action

Afghanistan	Albania	Algeria
Angola	Armenia, Republic of	Australia
Austria	Azerbaijan	Bangladesh
Belarus	Belgium	Belarus
Benin	Bhutan	Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina	Botswana	Brazil
Bulgaria	Burkina Faso	Burundi
Cambodia	Cameroon	Canada
Cape Verde	Central African Republic	Chad
Chile	China (People’s Republic of)	Colombia
Comoros	Congo, Republic of	Congo D. R.
Costa Rica	Côte d’Ivoire	Cook Islands
Croatia	Cyprus	Czech Republic
Denmark	Djibouti	Dominican Republic
Ecuador	Egypt	El Salvador
Eritrea	Estonia	Ethiopia
European Commission	Federated States of Micronesia	Fiji
Finland	France	Gabon
Gambia, The	Georgia	Germany
Ghana	Greece	Guatemala
Guinea	Guinea Bissau	Haiti
Holy See	Honduras	Hungary
Iceland	India	Indonesia
Iraq	Iran	Ireland
Israel	Italy	Jamaica
Japan	Jordan	Kazakhstan
Kenya	Kiribati	Korea
Kosovo	Kuwait	Kyrgyz Republic
Lao PDR	Latvia	Lesotho
Lebanon (the)	Liberia	Lithuania
Luxembourg	Madagascar	Malawi
Malaysia	Maldives	Mali
Marshall Islands	Mauritania	Mexico
Moldova	Mongolia	Morocco
Mozambique	Myanmar	Namibia
Nepal	The Netherlands	New Zealand
Nicaragua	Niger	Nigeria
Norway	Pakistan	Palestinian territories
Panama	Papua New Guinea	Paraguay
Peru	Philippines	Poland
Portugal	Romania	Russian Federation
Rwanda	Samoa	Sao Tomé & Principe
Saudi Arabia	Senegal	Serbia
Sierra Leone	Singapore	Slovak Republic
Slovenia	Solomon Islands	Somalia
South Africa	South Sudan	Spain
Sri Lanka	Sudan	Swaziland
Sweden	Switzerland	Tajikistan
Tanzania	Thailand	Timor-Leste
Togo	Tonga	Tunisia
Tuvalu	Turkey	Uganda
Ukraine	United Arab Emirates	United Kingdom
United States	Vanuatu	Vietnam
Yemen	Zambia	Zimbabwe

International Organisations adhering to the Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation

Abu Dhabi Fund for Development	African Capacity Building Foundation
African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP)	African Development Bank
African Union Commission	Arab Bank for Economic Development in Africa
Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development	Asian Development Bank
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Support Fund	Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)
Better Aid	Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Black Sea Trade and Development Bank	Business and Advisory Committee to the OECD
Caribbean Community (Caricom)	Caribbean Development Bank
Commonwealth Secretariat	Central American Bank for Economic Intergration (CABEI)
COMESA	Consultative Group to Assist the Poorest (CGAP)
Development Gateway	European Investment Bank (EIB)
GAVI Alliance	Global Environment Facility
Global Partnership for Education	Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria
Inter-American Development Bank	International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)
Inter-Parliamentary Union	International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
International Business Leaders Forum	International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC)
International Monetary Fund (IMF)	International Vaccine Institute
Islamic Development Bank	Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development
Learning Network on Capacity Development (LenCD)	New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD)
Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos	OPEC Fund for International Development
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and  Development (OECD)	Organization of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS)
Organisation internationale de la Francophonie	Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat
Regions United – Forum of Global Associations and Regions (ORU/FOGAR)	Saudi Fund for Development
UN Global Compact	United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG)
United Nations Development Group (UNDG)	United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction
World Business Council for Sustainable Development	World Bank

BANQUE D´ORIENT – A donation that will save Greece

I came across an amazing story and i would like to share it with all of you.

A news site that i usually read has this article about a donation made by a Greek family to the state and all the Greeks.

At the beginning of last century, in 1904, the National Bank of Greece founded the “Bank of the Orient”, commonly known as the «Banque d ‘Orient». The bank was subsequently developed in three main areas. Salonika, Smyrna and Alexandria. In 1932 the “East Bank” bought and merged with the parent of National Bank of Greece.

The shares were in gold and guarantor of any such stock was and still is… the Bank of France.

The refugees from Ionia, Cappadocia, the Caucasus, who eventually called for liquidation of the shares held by bank employees heard, especially after 1940 to respond to how the bills had no longer any value. The matter was forgotten. Some grandmothers and grandfathers some from Asia Minor had kept some of those shares in the chests. Others in the lockers until, forty of them appeared suddenly. Holder is a family from Patras .

The family took the shares to the National bank of Greece and the bank informs them in September 2010,that the shares hold no value.The family doesn’t give up.They contact experts on banking issues and legal and economic factors.

And here’s the surprise for the family.Mr. Theodore Karyotis is professor of economics at the University of Maryland in the U.S. and teaches Macroeconomics, International Economic Relations and microeconomics. He had gone to the valuation of shares. The conclusion is cuff. Each share of gold “Bank of East” now valued at 670 billion each. One and a half the current debt of Greece, which amounts to 450 billion . The total value of 40 shares approaching 30 trillion euros.

So this family decided to establish a non-profit organization, the «END».They donated 4 shares(remember 670 billion each) to the state.The value of the 4 shares is sufficient to pay the debt of Greece and the accumulated debt to banks for the Greek citizens and the existence of a large reserve for economic growth(at least this is what the family wants).

Too good to be true?Yes this is what i thought myself.Up to now there is no official response to this by the goverment or any politician and all the major Greek news sites and channels haven’t reported this yet.A few blogs and the site i will link only have the story.

Source in Greek

I am afraid that they will cover up the story and the money will be lost.But if this happens according to the family’s plans i have one thing to say:

Eat your heart out IMF.

The Roots Of The Brussels European Union

Death rate falls when doctors go on strike

“There are only four times in recorded history that the death rate actually fell. The first was in highly technologically developed Israel in 1973. During a one-month physicians’ strike, the national death-rate reached the lowest rate ever. According to statistics by the Jerusalem Burial Society, the number of funerals dropped by almost half.

The same thing happepned again in 1976 in Bogota, the capital city of Colombia. There, the doctors went on strike for 52 days. The death rate fell by 35% (National Catholic Reporter and confirmed by the National Morticians Association of Colombia).

Similar events happened in California a few years later, and in the United Kingdom in 1978 (see “Confessions of a Medical Heretic”, by Robert Mendelsohn, MD).”

Mind Control

The General Education Board (GEB), established by John D. Rockefeller, Sr., was chartered in 1902. And in Raymond Fosdick’s memorial history of the Board, he indicated it was part of John D. Rockefeller, Jr.’s effort toward the “goal of social control.” The GEB was established the year after SOCIAL CONTROL (1901) was written by Edward Alsworth Ross – Father of American Sociology.

1919. With funding from the Commonwealth Fund and the Rockefeller Foundation, Clifford Beers “formed the predecessor of WFMH [World Federation for Mental Health], the International Committee for Mental Hygiene.

1925. A Rockefeller Foundation’s grant gives birth to the International Bureau of Education.

1943: The Rockefeller Foundation helped fund the Allen Memorial Institute at McGill University in Montreal. Working with the Canadian military and the Office of Strategic Services (The OSS became the CIA in 1947), Dr. Cameron conducted torturous experiments on human guinea pigs in order to perfect the various mind control techniques. These brainwashing tactics included coercive interrogation, psychosurgery, drugs, hypnosis and “between 30 to 60 electroshocks over a short period” along with powerful tranquilizers to control anxiety.

At the end of the Second World War, the Rockefeller Foundation’s medical director, Alan Gregg, began to fund the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations (TIHR) to undertake the kind of social psychiatry that had been developed by the army during wartime and see if it could be relevant for civilian society.

Further promoting “world citizenship” was Dr. Ewen Cameron who, on May 5 of the year after PATHS TO BETTER SCHOOLS was published, delivered a speech titled “The Building of the Coming World Order” in which he pronounced: “What we call morals, are simply the customs, prohibitions and rules which a society maintains at any given time….The United Nations Organization deserves the support of all who are concerned with the building of a New World Order….There can be only one education anywhere on the earth and that is education for world citizenship.

Seven years later, Dr. Cameron would become president of the American Psychiatric Association, and in that same year (1953), Fabian Socialist Bertrand Russell’s THE IMPACT OF SCIENCE UPON SOCIETY was published, in which he explained: “I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology….Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen….Educational propaganda, with government help, could achieve this result in a generation.

In the late 1950s, the National Mental Health Institute commenced a program to have public schools administer Ritalin to children classified as “dull” or “emotionally disturbed.”

In Zbigniew Brzezinski’s BETWEEN TWO AGES: AMERICA’S ROLE IN THE TECHNETRONIC ERA (1970), he referred to “the increasing availability of biochemical means of human control,” and said “human beings become increasingly manipulable and malleable.” After reading this book, David Rockefeller named Brzezinski as the first director of the Trilateral Commission, which was established in 1973.

In a 1973 memo on the Trilateral Policy Program, then-director Brzezinski recommended the study of ‘Control Over Man’s Development and Behavior’ as a theme for later consideration. More specifically such a task force would undertake to study ‘the social-education implications of the availability, especially in advanced societies, of new means of social control.’…Trilateralism is the current attempt by ruling elites to manage both dependence and democracy—at home and abroad….Economic gain and social control are inseparable goals of trilateralism.

The secret report that shows how the Nazis planned a Fourth Reich …in the EU

The paper is aged and fragile, the typewritten letters slowly fading. But US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128 is as chilling now as the day it was written in November 1944.

The document, also known as the Red House Report, is a detailed account of a secret meeting at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944. There, Nazi officials ordered an elite group of German industrialists to plan for Germany’s post-war recovery, prepare for the Nazis’ return to power and work for a ‘strong German empire’. In other words: the Fourth Reich.

Plotters: SS chief Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with Nazi-backed company I. G. Farben

The three-page, closely typed report, marked ‘Secret’, copied to British officials and sent by air pouch to Cordell Hull, the US Secretary of State, detailed how the industrialists were to work with the Nazi Party to rebuild Germany’s economy by sending money through Switzerland.

They would set up a network of secret front companies abroad. They would wait until conditions were right. And then they would take over Germany again.

The industrialists included representatives of Volkswagen, Krupp and Messerschmitt. Officials from the Navy and Ministry of Armaments were also at the meeting and, with incredible foresight, they decided together that the Fourth German Reich, unlike its predecessor, would be an economic rather than a military empire – but not just German.

The Red House Report, which was unearthed from US intelligence files, was the inspiration for my thriller The Budapest Protocol.

The book opens in 1944 as the Red Army advances on the besieged city, then jumps to the present day, during the election campaign for the first president of Europe. The European Union superstate is revealed as a front for a sinister conspiracy, one rooted in the last days of the Second World War.

But as I researched and wrote the novel, I realised that some of the Red House Report had become fact.

Nazi Germany did export massive amounts of capital through neutral countries. German businesses did set up a network of front companies abroad. The German economy did soon recover after 1945.

The Third Reich was defeated militarily, but powerful Nazi-era bankers, industrialists and civil servants, reborn as democrats, soon prospered in the new West Germany. There they worked for a new cause: European economic and political integration.

Is it possible that the Fourth Reich those Nazi industrialists foresaw has, in some part at least, come to pass?

The Red House Report was written by a French spy who was at the meeting in Strasbourg in 1944 – and it paints an extraordinary picture.

The industrialists gathered at the Maison Rouge Hotel waited expectantly as SS Obergruppenfuhrer Dr Scheid began the meeting. Scheid held one of the highest ranks in the SS, equivalent to Lieutenant General. He cut an imposing figure in his tailored grey-green uniform and high, peaked cap with silver braiding. Guards were posted outside and the room had been searched for microphones.

Death camp: Auschwitz, where tens of thousands of slave labourers died working in a factory run by German firm I. G. Farben

There was a sharp intake of breath as he began to speak. German industry must realise that the war cannot be won, he declared. ‘It must take steps in preparation for a post-war commercial campaign.’ Such defeatist talk was treasonous – enough to earn a visit to the Gestapo’s cellars, followed by a one-way trip to a concentration camp.

But Scheid had been given special licence to speak the truth – the future of the Reich was at stake. He ordered the industrialists to ‘make contacts and alliances with foreign firms, but this must be done individually and without attracting any suspicion’.

The industrialists were to borrow substantial sums from foreign countries after the war.

They were especially to exploit the finances of those German firms that had already been used as fronts for economic penetration abroad, said Scheid, citing the American partners of the steel giant Krupp as well as Zeiss, Leica and the Hamburg-America Line shipping company.

But as most of the industrialists left the meeting, a handful were beckoned into another smaller gathering, presided over by Dr Bosse of the Armaments Ministry. There were secrets to be shared with the elite of the elite.

Bosse explained how, even though the Nazi Party had informed the industrialists that the war was lost, resistance against the Allies would continue until a guarantee of German unity could be obtained. He then laid out the secret three-stage strategy for the Fourth Reich.

In stage one, the industrialists were to ‘prepare themselves to finance the Nazi Party, which would be forced to go underground as a Maquis’, using the term for the French resistance.

Stage two would see the government allocating large sums to German industrialists to establish a ‘secure post-war foundation in foreign countries’, while ‘existing financial reserves must be placed at the disposal of the party so that a strong German empire can be created after the defeat’.

In stage three, German businesses would set up a ‘sleeper’ network of agents abroad through front companies, which were to be covers for military research and intelligence, until the Nazis returned to power.

‘The existence of these is to be known only by very few people in each industry and by chiefs of the Nazi Party,’ Bosse announced.

‘Each office will have a liaison agent with the party. As soon as the party becomes strong enough to re-establish its control over Germany, the industrialists will be paid for their effort and co-operation by concessions and orders.’

Enlarge  

Extraordinary revelations: The 1944 Red House Report, detailing ‘plans of German industrialists to engage in underground activity’

The exported funds were to be channelled through two banks in Zurich, or via agencies in Switzerland which bought property in Switzerland for German concerns, for a five per cent commission.

The Nazis had been covertly sending funds through neutral countries for years.

Swiss banks, in particular the Swiss National Bank, accepted gold looted from the treasuries of Nazi-occupied countries. They accepted assets and property titles taken from Jewish businessmen in Germany and occupied countries, and supplied the foreign currency that the Nazis needed to buy vital war materials.

Swiss economic collaboration with the Nazis had been closely monitored by Allied intelligence.

The Red House Report’s author notes: ‘Previously, exports of capital by German industrialists to neutral countries had to be accomplished rather surreptitiously and by means of special influence.

‘Now the Nazi Party stands behind the industrialists and urges them to save themselves by getting funds outside Germany and at the same time advance the party’s plans for its post-war operations.’

The order to export foreign capital was technically illegal in Nazi Germany, but by the summer of 1944 the law did not matter.

More than two months after D-Day, the Nazis were being squeezed by the Allies from the west and the Soviets from the east. Hitler had been badly wounded in an assassination attempt. The Nazi leadership was nervous, fractious and quarrelling.

During the war years the SS had built up a gigantic economic empire, based on plunder and murder, and they planned to keep it.

A meeting such as that at the Maison Rouge would need the protection of the SS, according to Dr Adam Tooze of Cambridge University, author of Wages of Destruction: The Making And Breaking Of The Nazi Economy.

He says: ‘By 1944 any discussion of post-war planning was banned. It was extremely dangerous to do that in public. But the SS was thinking in the long-term. If you are trying to establish a workable coalition after the war, the only safe place to do it is under the auspices of the apparatus of terror.’

Shrewd SS leaders such as Otto Ohlendorf were already thinking ahead.

As commander of Einsatzgruppe D, which operated on the Eastern Front between 1941 and 1942, Ohlendorf was responsible for the murder of 90,000 men, women and children.

A highly educated, intelligent lawyer and economist, Ohlendorf showed great concern for the psychological welfare of his extermination squad’s gunmen: he ordered that several of them should fire simultaneously at their victims, so as to avoid any feelings of personal responsibility.

By the winter of 1943 he was transferred to the Ministry of Economics. Ohlendorf’s ostensible job was focusing on export trade, but his real priority was preserving the SS’s massive pan-European economic empire after Germany’s defeat.

Ohlendorf, who was later hanged at Nuremberg, took particular interest in the work of a German economist called Ludwig Erhard. Erhard had written a lengthy manuscript on the transition to a post-war economy after Germany’s defeat. This was dangerous, especially as his name had been mentioned in connection with resistance groups.

But Ohlendorf, who was also chief of the SD, the Nazi domestic security service, protected Erhard as he agreed with his views on stabilising the post-war German economy. Ohlendorf himself was protected by Heinrich Himmler, the chief of the SS.

Ohlendorf and Erhard feared a bout of hyper-inflation, such as the one that had destroyed the German economy in the Twenties. Such a catastrophe would render the SS’s economic empire almost worthless.

The two men agreed that the post-war priority was rapid monetary stabilisation through a stable currency unit, but they realised this would have to be enforced by a friendly occupying power, as no post-war German state would have enough legitimacy to introduce a currency that would have any value.

That unit would become the Deutschmark, which was introduced in 1948. It was an astonishing success and it kick-started the German economy. With a stable currency, Germany was once again an attractive trading partner.

The German industrial conglomerates could rapidly rebuild their economic empires across Europe.

War had been extraordinarily profitable for the German economy. By 1948 – despite six years of conflict, Allied bombing and post-war reparations payments – the capital stock of assets such as equipment and buildings was larger than in 1936, thanks mainly to the armaments boom.

Erhard pondered how German industry could expand its reach across the shattered European continent. The answer was through supranationalism – the voluntary surrender of national sovereignty to an international body.

Germany and France were the drivers behind the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), the precursor to the European Union. The ECSC was the first supranational organisation, established in April 1951 by six European states. It created a common market for coal and steel which it regulated. This set a vital precedent for the steady erosion of national sovereignty, a process that continues today.

But before the common market could be set up, the Nazi industrialists had to be pardoned, and Nazi bankers and officials reintegrated. In 1957, John J. McCloy, the American High Commissioner for Germany, issued an amnesty for industrialists convicted of war crimes.

The two most powerful Nazi industrialists, Alfried Krupp of Krupp Industries and Friedrich Flick, whose Flick Group eventually owned a 40 per cent stake in Daimler-Benz, were released from prison after serving barely three years.

Krupp and Flick had been central figures in the Nazi economy. Their companies used slave labourers like cattle, to be worked to death.

The Krupp company soon became one of Europe’s leading industrial combines.

The Flick Group also quickly built up a new pan-European business empire. Friedrich Flick remained unrepentant about his wartime record and refused to pay a single Deutschmark in compensation until his death in July 1972 at the age of 90, when he left a fortune of more than $1billion, the equivalent of £400million at the time.

‘For many leading industrial figures close to the Nazi regime, Europe became a cover for pursuing German national interests after the defeat of Hitler,’ says historian Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, an adviser to Jewish former slave labourers.

‘The continuity of the economy of Germany and the economies of post-war Europe is striking. Some of the leading figures in the Nazi economy became leading builders of the European Union.’

Numerous household names had exploited slave and forced labourers including BMW, Siemens and Volkswagen, which produced munitions and the V1 rocket.

Slave labour was an integral part of the Nazi war machine. Many concentration camps were attached to dedicated factories where company officials worked hand-in-hand with the SS officers overseeing the camps.

Like Krupp and Flick, Hermann Abs, post-war Germany’s most powerful banker, had prospered in the Third Reich. Dapper, elegant and diplomatic, Abs joined the board of Deutsche Bank, Germany’s biggest bank, in 1937. As the Nazi empire expanded, Deutsche Bank enthusiastically ‘Aryanised’ Austrian and Czechoslovak banks that were owned by Jews.

By 1942, Abs held 40 directorships, a quarter of which were in countries occupied by the Nazis. Many of these Aryanised companies used slave labour and by 1943 Deutsche Bank’s wealth had quadrupled.

Abs also sat on the supervisory board of I.G. Farben, as Deutsche Bank’s representative. I.G. Farben was one of Nazi Germany’s most powerful companies, formed out of a union of BASF, Bayer, Hoechst and subsidiaries in the Twenties.

It was so deeply entwined with the SS and the Nazis that it ran its own slave labour camp at Auschwitz, known as Auschwitz III, where tens of thousands of Jews and other prisoners died producing artificial rubber.

When they could work no longer, or were verbraucht (used up) in the Nazis’ chilling term, they were moved to Birkenau. There they were gassed using Zyklon B, the patent for which was owned by I.G. Farben.

But like all good businessmen, I.G. Farben’s bosses hedged their bets.

During the war the company had financed Ludwig Erhard’s research. After the war, 24 I.G. Farben executives were indicted for war crimes over Auschwitz III – but only twelve of the 24 were found guilty and sentenced to prison terms ranging from one-and-a-half to eight years. I.G. Farben got away with mass murder.

Abs was one of the most important figures in Germany’s post-war reconstruction. It was largely thanks to him that, just as the Red House Report exhorted, a ‘strong German empire’ was indeed rebuilt, one which formed the basis of today’s European Union.

Abs was put in charge of allocating Marshall Aid – reconstruction funds – to German industry. By 1948 he was effectively managing Germany’s economic recovery.

Crucially, Abs was also a member of the European League for Economic Co-operation, an elite intellectual pressure group set up in 1946. The league was dedicated to the establishment of a common market, the precursor of the European Union.

Its members included industrialists and financiers and it developed policies that are strikingly familiar today – on monetary integration and common transport, energy and welfare systems.

When Konrad Adenauer, the first Chancellor of West Germany, took power in 1949, Abs was his most important financial adviser.

Behind the scenes Abs was working hard for Deutsche Bank to be allowed to reconstitute itself after decentralisation. In 1957 he succeeded and he returned to his former employer.

That same year the six members of the ECSC signed the Treaty of Rome, which set up the European Economic Community. The treaty further liberalised trade and established increasingly powerful supranational institutions including the European Parliament and European Commission.

Like Abs, Ludwig Erhard flourished in post-war Germany. Adenauer made Erhard Germany’s first post-war economics minister. In 1963 Erhard succeeded Adenauer as Chancellor for three years.

But the German economic miracle – so vital to the idea of a new Europe – was built on mass murder. The number of slave and forced labourers who died while employed by German companies in the Nazi era was 2,700,000.

Some sporadic compensation payments were made but German industry agreed a conclusive, global settlement only in 2000, with a £3billion compensation fund. There was no admission of legal liability and the individual compensation was paltry.

A slave labourer would receive 15,000 Deutschmarks (about £5,000), a forced labourer 5,000 (about £1,600). Any claimant accepting the deal had to undertake not to launch any further legal action.

To put this sum of money into perspective, in 2001 Volkswagen alone made profits of £1.8billion.

Next month, 27 European Union member states vote in the biggest transnational election in history. Europe now enjoys peace and stability. Germany is a democracy, once again home to a substantial Jewish community. The Holocaust is seared into national memory.

But the Red House Report is a bridge from a sunny present to a dark past. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s propaganda chief, once said: ‘In 50 years’ time nobody will think of nation states.’

For now, the nation state endures. But these three typewritten pages are a reminder that today’s drive towards a European federal state is inexorably tangled up with the plans of the SS and German industrialists for a Fourth Reich – an economic rather than military imperium.

• The Budapest Protocol, Adam LeBor’s thriller inspired by the Red House Report, is published by Reportage Press.